Monday, May 3, 2010

There's no Trading In this Chassis


I am a new car person. I've heard the argument dozens, if not hundreds, of times about how financially wasteful it is to go into a new car dealership every seven to eight years and plunk down my hard earned cash for a car that reads "0" on the odometer, but I don't care.

I have my reasons, for wanting a new car and it has nothing to do with breathing in that new car smell (which is probably bad for you anyway), or having a shiny new car.

You see, I just like to get in my car, put gas in it, make my monthly payments, and do some minor regular maintenance like oil changes.
Older cars are drama queens--they're always demanding attention and money. While it's probably cheaper to fix a transmission on a car with 100,000 miles then buy a new one, I've made the decision that I don't want the drama of breaking down on a superhighway the first day into a vacation and having an unexpected, unplanned large automotive repair bill.

I've gotten to that point with my current car, but its a rather sad decision for me. I'm currently driving a 2004 Volvo XC70 with just under 80,000 miles. Believe it or not, although it is a station wagon, it's my second favorite car, and definitely my favorite "MOMMobile" since I've had to start driving large vehicles that can haul large amounts of people and stuff.
My absolute favorite car of all time was the 1966 Mustang I drove in high school. No power brakes, no power steering--it drove like a tank, but man it was a cool car.

I love my Volvo, but it's drama queen tendencies have become pronounced of late. In the last two years I've had to spend over $1,500 on the brakes, another $1,300 when a tire went flat and it turned out that the tire had some how rusted onto the axle requiring a week in the shop and four new tires (we couldn't replace just the one that went flat), an $800 tune up, and $2,500 when the computer system that runs the ABS brakes went out (it was in the shop for a week then as well). Right now I've got the "Check Engine" light flashing although the shop is telling me it's just something wrong in the circuitry and I've been waiting for the part to correct that for over two weeks.
So, this weekend my husband and I headed out to the dealerships looking at new cars. It would be simple if Volvo still made the same car I now drive--I'd simply buy another one. But since I bought my car, Volvo has gone a bit downhill. The XC70 has gone from being a luxury wagon to an expensive Taurus, and, Volvo no longer sells it with a jump seat, so I can only get five people in it.

I'm bringing up this whole car saga because our bodies are a lot like cars. They run fairly well with minimal maintenance and care for a number of years, and then all sorts of unplanned and expensive shit starts to happen. But, unlike a car, you can't just get a new one. You have to deal with what you got. So while a car may need new brakes, you may need a new knee.

And, like a car, the kind of repairs that you'll need to do can be minimized with good maintenance. Take care of those regular oil changes, and you'll avoid expensive engine problems later on.

Yes, like older cars, older bodies are drama queens. There's always an achy shoulder, a sore knee or some female or male organ that demanding attention. But, we can minimize some of the drama with good maintenance. The most important maintenance you can do on your body is maintaining an appropriate weight and exercising. Excessive weight can lead to diabetes, cardiac issues and cancer. So watch your weight and avoid the drama.

Friday, April 30, 2010

My thighs Are All in My Head

Bitchcakes has a very good posting today about her animosity towards her thighs. Read it here: http://msbitchcakes.blogspot.com/

Bitchcakes, I can relate. For as far back as I can remember, my thighs and me have been at odds.

I remember standing in front of mirrors when I was in high school and college, pulling back the fat on my thighs in a way so that you couldn't see it from the front and thinking "if only." I have to admit I still do it from time to time and think about whether or not I should shoot the family budget on a little liposuction.

Funny thing is, a few years ago I found a photo of me in a bikini from when I was in my mid-20's. At first I didn't recognize myself. The girl in the photo was HOT. I mean, I couldn't get over the body I had--this girl was thin, muscular and had curves in the right places.

Then I thought, about how back then I was always thinking I needed thinner thighs, bigger boobs (I'm a D cup), or slimmer waist. Yet here I was over 20 years later staring at this picture and wondering what the hell I was thinking.

It all goes to perception. Once I hit my 20's I probably never had 19 inch thighs and never will (unless I submit to the aforementioned liposuction). I'm a naturally busty girl who has the hips, thighs and butt that go along with being naturally busty. I can be thin and healthy for my body type, but I'll never be built like Kate Moss.

So the message to myself is to stop fixating on my thighs, and focus on my overall health. Besides I've got better things to spend a few grand on then my thighs.

A Freak No More


This is a picture of a side-show "fat man" from the early 20th Century. People actually paid to see this "freak" 100 years ago, but he would fit in practically anywhere today. If you saw this guy walking past you in an airport or a mall in sweatpants and a baggy T-shirt, you probably wouldn't even turn your head. There's no longer any shock value to seeing someone weighing 300, 400 or 500 pounds anymore. You can read a little more about him here: http://modeledbehavior.com/2010/04/18/americas-obesity-epidemic-bringing-sideshow-freaks-into-the-discussion/
This man actually died at the age of 43, no doubt from his obesity, but it got me thinking about all the other "fat men" and "fat ladies" who participated in circus side-shows in the last century. They'd all be out of work today because they're now normal. It's a very sad comment on our society.

The Flu Diet

Well, I spent the day in bed yesterday with a fever and severe gastro-intestinal issues. I'm still not up to speed today, but for the heck of it, I stepped on the scale this morning. I was two pounds lighter than I was earlier in the week.

I need to get a little work done today, but I'm going down soon for a nap again.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Sick Kid, Sick Me?

My daughter has been home since Tuesday with some kind of stomach bug. My poor baby has been lying on the sofa, with a bucket next to her, weak and listless. It makes me want to cry. There's no fever but her poor tummy just doesn't want to tolerate any food beyond Jello and some Ginger-ale.

So this morning I woke up feeling achy, and in a head fog. My tummy is also not all that happy either. I guess I've caught a touch of whatever bug my daughter has been fighting.

All I want to do is go to bed, but I have to read the 23 page complaint filed by the state attorneys generals arguing that the new health care reform bill is unconstitutional then speak with a few constitutional law professors from places like Harvard, Yale, Georgetown and Vanderbilt as to why or why not this law will or will not be held up as constitutional. I'm writing on article on this for one of my clients, and deadlines are deadlines, sick or not.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

OMG!! Has it Really been a Year???

Actually, more than a year since I started blogging. My first post was on April 21, 2009, and here it is April 28, 2010.

I know that a lot of bloggers get frustrated that their blogs aren't instant successes, racking up hundreds of followers immediately, but that isn't my case. I love and cherish each one of my 41 followers and love to read every comments posted.

I blog because I'm a writer, and a writer writes for no other reason than the compulsion to write. I started this blog because I believed I had learned valuable lessons from my own weight loss journey that I could pass on to others, but I also started this blog to keep myself inspired.

Whenever I read about new medical research regarding weight loss, the obesity epidemic among children or the ill effects that processed foods can have on health and weight, it inspires me to continue on my journey.

By posting new information here and commenting on it I pass on the information to my readers. You may be a small group, but if my writing makes even small changes in your own diets and how you feed your family, I believed I scored a success.

It Was Worth "Ruining" my Body


I love and adore my children. However, as any woman who has ever experienced child-birth can tell you, your body is never the same afterwards. Still, when I'm with my children it would never occur to me to think that having a better body was more worthwhile then having them.


I'm all for eating healthy, exercising and having the best body we possibly can, but to be so vain as to deny yourself one of life's greatest joys just to preserve your body is taking it a step too far.

Now, I understand that some people just don't want to have children, and I respect that. Having children is a tremendous responsibility, and not one to take lightly if you feel you're not up to it. Hell, I won't get a dog because I don't want the responsibility.

But, to say you don't want children only to preserve your body, is another matter. I hope Ms. Michaels eventually rethinks her priorities.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Too Fat to Fight?

You know we got a problem when even the US military wants changes to the school lunch program. It turns out that they have to turn away approximately 25% of potential recruits for being too overweight to fight. And, because young adults are raised with bad eating habits, they have to discharge far too many of those who they do initially recruit for being too fat.

You can read about it here: http://www.missionreadiness.org/

This report, by a group of retired military officers, says that national security is threatened by the sharp rise in obesity rates for young people over the last 15 years. The group Mission: Readiness contends that weight problems are now the leading medical reason that recruits are rejected, and jeopardizes the military's ability to fill its ranks.

The report says that 27 percent of Americans ages 17 to 24, are too fat to join the military.

The retired officers were on Capitol Hill advocating for passage of a wide-ranging nutrition bill that aims to make the nation's school lunches healthier.

The military getting involved is a powerful symbol. The school lunch program was established in 1946 because during World War II, military leaders had the opposite problem. Too many recruits were rejected because of stunted growth and inadequate nutrition. After the war, it was military leaders who pushed Congress to establish the national school lunch program.

Specifically, the military leaders want Congress to eliminate junk food and high-calorie beverages from schools, put more money into the school lunch program and develop new strategies that help children develop healthier habits.

So, now that the military is on board with this, do you think we could get bipartisan support for improved school lunches?

Support the military--get junk food out of our schools!!!

The Irish and Irish Food


I had a truly wonderful time in Ireland. We drove from Dublin, down to Cashel, to the West Coast then back to Dublin again. One of the first things I noticed is that the Irish are definitely thinner then us. Not that they are stick thin, but you don't see the any really fat or obese people walking around the way you do here.
The Irish, however, aren't all that svelte either, and I was pretty amazed at the number of miracle, fat burning products advertised. My favorite was the band you wrapped around your waist, thighs etc. that burned fat as you slept.
The food itself was wonderful. It's not haute cuisine, but my husband and I were impressed by how flavorful every ingredient was. Because we had a large breakfast every day, we generally skipped sit down lunches in favor of just snacking on bread, cheese and fresh fruit. But no matter where we bought the bread, cheese and fruit, is was first quality. Even if we went into the SPAR, which is kind of an Irish equivalent to 7/11 the apples were fresh and not at all mealy.
And, fruit was abundant everywhere. Fruit was available in every "fast food" place we saw, and it not only looked good but was good.
The bread was also amazing. I usually avoid Croissants here in the states because they're just soggy and greasy, but the Croissants we had for breakfast there, while not as great as those in France, were still light and flaky.
And, I never knew potatoes could taste so good. No wonder the Irish love them. Even a simple boiled potato with no sauce on it was a revelation food-wise.
Someone explained to us that as a rule, food doesn't travel far in Ireland, or the EU in general. They eat what's produced close, and they don't mass produce food and ship it long distances the way we do here. The difference in the approach is what accounts for the difference in food taste. The emphasis is on producing good tasting food, not food that can withstand travel.

Friday, April 23, 2010

I'm BA-A-A-CK!!!

Amazingly, I dodged the volcanic ash and not only made it to Ireland without even a delay, but back as well. I have some thoughts about how the Irish eat, but I'll have to blog about it tomorrow or Monday. Right now I need to finish unpacking, cleaning clothes, sorting the mail, etc.

It's good to be back.

And, sorry Jack, but I never knocked back a Guinness (although my husband quaffed many). I can't stand the taste of beer. I tasted my husband's brew on several occasions but stuck with either tea or wine (although I did have a hard cider in Dingle which was delish).

Friday, April 16, 2010

Gone, but not Forgotten



My husband and I are supposed to fly to Ireland tonight for one of our periodic honeymoon trips (Mom's going to watch the kids). If we actually fly (and despite the volcanic mess in the atmosphere, Irish airports are open), I'll be gone for a week and not blogging.


But I'll be back. Just check back in a week or so.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Changes

SkinnyHollie has a great post on making changes in her household which you can read here: http://www.skinnyhollie.com/2010/04/ch-ch-ch-changes.html



I'm lucky in that our school district went "healthy" a few years ago so that there's no real junk food in the lunch program (all whole grains, no french fries, locally sourced fruits and veggies, etc), and there are no vending machines with candy and soda on school grounds. So, unlike Hollie, I don't have to make lunch for my kids to take to school, but if you're district is still serving the kind of food chronicled in the School Lunch Project (http://fedupwithschoollunch.blogspot.com/), it's something you may want to consider.

And, I put my whole family on the "no fast food" diet years ago. None of us needs it. Besides, I've found there's plenty of good, healthy, home-made "fast food" that I can make. And, as I always point out, I burn far more calories making food, then sitting on my butt and going through a drive through.

One thing I've learned about losing weight and keeping it off. It's not a solo project. The whole family has to change it's eating habits, not just you. And, you're not depriving them of anything, you're helping them on the road to good lifetime habits.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

America The Obese




A must read article in this Month's Atlantic: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/beating-obesity/8017


The author, who underwent bariatric surgery, discusses Americans' weight problem and postures:

"If we are to solve the many problems that obesity is creating for American society, we must first move beyond the stale “willpower versus the food-industrial complex” debate. We need to understand what causes obesity, and what can really address it. And we need to try everything from rezoning fast-food restaurants and restricting food advertising to supporting new treatments and rewriting insurance policies. We won’t summon the collective will to take these steps until we recognize that our attitudes toward obesity are as unhealthy as the condition itself. We don’t want to look at fat people, much less pay for their medical care; we don’t want to be contaminated by them. But if we want fewer fat people in our midst, then we, as a nation, must start by treating them without condescension or contempt, and recognize the real obstacles that stand between them and better health."

Give a Hoot--Don't Pollute

I'm a big fan of the AMC show Mad Men. If you're unfamiliar with the show, it's about a bunch of hard-drinking, smoking, loutish ad men in the early 1960's. The creators of the show go that extra mile to really make it a period piece--not only in terms of style, but attitudes and social norms.

So yesterday, I'm watching a Mad Men rerun from the second season. The suave, philandering anti-hero, Don Draper, takes his family for a picnic in a pretty rural spot. The eat, relax, play checkers, then when it's time to go, Don finishes swilling his beer, crushes the can and throws it into the woods. His Grace Kellyish, dutiful wife starts to pack up the picnic, then lifts the blanket, depositing all the paper plates, cups, etc. onto the ground and just leaves it there.

Now, I remember people doing this in the 1960's. No one thought about cleaning up after themselves in public parks, the woods etc. Then came the 1970's and the anti-pollution message started coming on fast and furious.

Remember Woodsy the Owl and his "Give a Hoot, Don't Pollute" ads? I do.

Then there was the famous commercial with the older Indian man crying over pollution.

The point is that these ad campaigns worked. People did change their attitudes so that by the end of the 1970's it became unthinkable to have a picnic and not clean up your garbage after yourself.

So, when I look at the efforts of both Michelle Obama and Jamie Oliver to get this country on the path to eating right. I have hope. I truly believe that this country is waking up to the fact that we can not continue on the culinary course we've been on. Fast food is not our future.

Can we learn to cook and make our own food again? I think we can. I think we can also learn to love real food, and to reassign over-processed, nutritionally devoid food to it's appropriate place--the garbage bin.


Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Mama Mia that's a Fattening Pasta!!!!

I tend to not eat pasta in restaurants because I eat so much of it at home. It's a good thing, because although pasta when made right can be a healthy, low cal, energizing meal, in the wrong hands its a caloric disaster.

For example, if you were to partake in an order of the Cheesecake Factory's Bistro Shrimp Pasta, you'd probably be adding a good half pound or so to your waistline. That's because this dish packs a whopping 2,819 calories in one serving!!!

And, don't let the word "healthy" fool you when the sauce is garlic-infused cream. The Olive Garden's Garden Herb Chicken con Broccoli has 960 calories, leaving you with not much wiggle room, calorically, for the rest of the day.

And, don't think you're doing yourself any favors by ordering a kids' portion. The Cheesecake Factory's Kids' Pasta with Alfredo Sauce has 1,803 calories (I'd hate to see how many calories are in the Adult version).

Read about other pasta dishes you may want to avoid here: http://health.yahoo.com/experts/eatthis/50083/7-unhealthiest-pasta-dishes-in-america/

So, the moral of the story here is to know before you order.

Take it Or Leave It


Sunday night for dinner I made pork chops on the barbecue for dinner. Nothing fancy. I just sprinkled the pork chops with salt and pepper and threw them on the grill.
Now, I've made pork chops before and my kids always ate them. It's not one of their favorite meals, but they eat them anyway. But something about the flavor the smoke imparted to the pork chops created a problem on Sunday night. My daughter, who had eaten herb crusted pork in school that week and loved it, refused to eat the pork chops. My son also let us know that he didn't like the meat.
My husband and I stood firm, however. We let both kids know that this was the meal and they either ate what was on their plates or they didn't eat. If they chose not to eat, there would be no other food or snacks provided to them until breakfast the next morning. My daughter chose not to eat. My son drenched the pork chop in ketchup and ate it.
I think that too often we obsess so much on kids eating, that we'll just give in to their eating junk. For some insane reasons millions of parents in this country think its better to feed their children processed chicken nuggets or sugar laden yogurt then not to eat at all.
I, however, think parents who do this are doing more harm to their children then good. First, it sets them on the path of having life-long bad eating habits. Second, they're teaching their children to be rude. These children will expect everyone to cater to their tastes. They're not being taught that you either eat what's in front of you, or just sit and be polite.
Needless to say, I won't be grilling pork chops again anytime soon. But, my daughter learned an important lesson, and she survived going without a meal.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Could We Please Get Healthier Movie Snacks?

I'd be happy if they just offered air-popped pop-corn instead of the calorie-laden, chemical filled stuff they currently sell: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2010/04/10/movie_theaters_should_offer_healthier_snacks.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+diet-blog+%28Diet+Blog%29

As I blogged here: http://losingweightafter45isabitch.blogspot.com/2009/11/see-movie-but-skip-popcorn.html a medium movie theatre pop-corn has 1,200 calories BEFORE you add the butter. That's because of what they pop the corn in. It's a heavy oil laden with fat and chemicals. If they just brought in some air poppers, they can offer a healthier alternative to those of us who care.

Friday, April 9, 2010

It Might be a Good Idea to Skip the Latte



If you decide to have a latte at Krispy Kreme, you better skip the donut--and eating for most of the day. That's because a Krispy Kreme Latte contains a whopping 1050 calories.


And, that's not even the worst coffee drink you can order. Check it out here: http://health.yahoo.com/experts/eatthis/49512/unhealthiest-coffee-drinks-in-america/

A Cosi Double Oh! Arctic Mocha contains a whopping 1,210 calories.
It all gets back to not drinking your calories. If you love coffee (and I sure do) order a regular coffee with skim milk and forget the fancy drinks.

Three Pounds Down

It's Spring, so a couple of weeks ago I decided to get serious about losing my Winter weight. Additionally, I'm leaving for Ireland next Friday with my husband for one of our periodic "honeymoons" (the kids are going to stay in NJ with my mother), and I want to have a little "wriggle room" to eat a bit more freely.

So for the last two weeks I've upped my raw percentage to about 80% of my weekly food consumption and increased the amount of exercise and movement I've done. There's been a lot of salad in my life these past two weeks, and my juicer has gotten a work-out as well.

The good news is that there's been a definite pay-back for my efforts. I'm down over three pounds in the last two weeks.

Three down, one more week to go.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

No, You Can't Just Get a Shot

The FDA has stated that so called fat dissolving treatments offered by spas are just plain bogus.

Read about it here: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63645H20100407

It seems that a number of spas have been offering these "treatments" called names such as lipodissolve, mesotherapy, lipozap, lipotherapy, or injection lipolysis. All involved a series of injections into whatever area you wanted to dissolve the fat (ouch!!).

Well, the bottom line is that the FDA determined that they don't work.

Of course they don't work. Unless you shell out big bucks for liposuction (and go through the recovery period), there's only one way to lose weight--substantially reduce your caloric intake and exercise.

That's right. Losing weight is a tremendous bitch. There just is no easy way to do it. So save your money on treatments and miracle pills, and just eat better, eat less and move.

What Is It with These People???

I simply cannot get over the hysteria people work themselves into just because people are trying to change Americans bad eating habits.

Some back-ground, on Monday at the Easter Egg roll on the White House lawn, the Obama's replaced some of the candy in the kids' goodie bags with fruit (they still got chocolate and Peeps), and set up exercise stations manned by athletes on the lawn as well.

Now, I think these changes, should be lauded, but, of course, there are a number of naysayers. I not only found the hysteria in this post over at Reason laughable, but the comments to the post are even more laughable: http://reason.com/blog/2010/04/06/michelle-obama-replaces-easter. Could someone please explain to me hour putting fruit in a kids' goody bag will make eating fruit "mandatory?"

I found this quote in the article particularly hysterical: "Like most obesity eliminationists, Barack and Michelle Obama are willing to fight fat on the beaches, in the lunch rooms, and dining rooms, anywhere and whatever the cost may be, including engendering an eating disorder in their own children ("Malia was getting a little chubby...") because the only thing worse than being a bulimic is being a fat bulimic."

The Obama's are "obesity elimationists?" What's that mean? That they are going to subject obese people to their own Holocaust or something?

This post calling Michelle Obama "The National Nanny" also caught my eye: http://belowthebeltway.com/2010/04/06/michelle-obama-assumes-the-role-of-national-nanny-at-white-house-easter-egg-roll/.

These are children aren't they? I find it amusing that instead of honestly criticizing Michelle Obama's efforts, critics resort to using alarmist words like "nanny," "nanny state," "socialism," "paternalism."

So, the bottom line is that all they're doing is just calling names. It's all so childish. I don't know what's worse, the critics who throw these terms around because they don't have any better honest arguments, or the rubes who post comments to these posts who agree with them using even more pathetic arguments and name calling.



Does USDA Mean "Ultra Silly Dietary Agenda?"

Marion Nestle has written an extremely informative post about the history and politics of the school lunch program. You can read it here: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/04/eating-liberally-the-child-nutrition-act/

Essentially, the school lunch program was developed to use up surplus agricultural commodities by feeding hungry kids (remember back then kids actually suffered from malnourishment here in the US). So while feeding kids was a side benefit, the real goal was to get rid of agricultural surpluses (driving up prices).

So feeding kids properly was never a goal of the school lunch program, and the problem has only gotten worse as time has progressed. Special interests have intervened to the point were it's impossible to serve kids "real" food, and so schools have to rely on overly processed foods to meet the standards.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Let Them Eat Tarte Tartin


An interesting and provocative piece about Alice Waters: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-alice-waters2-2010apr02,0,5529397,full.story
I happen to agree with Alice Waters about the need to eat local, organic produce, although I don't take it as "religiously" as she does.
But if that's her thing, that's her thing, and I don't understand why people have a problem with that. She makes great food, and by being so "pure" it does get the point across. Not everyone will, of course, adopt her pureness, but if only a bit rubs off, isn't that a good thing?

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Tomorrow is National Start Walking Day

OK everyone, get out those walking shoes and start walking. The American Heart Association has designated April 7 as National Start Walking Day--an initiative designed to just encourage Americans to start to move. AHA is challenging every American to walk a mere 30 minutes.

So, let's all get walking!!!

http://startwalkingnow.org/

Monday, April 5, 2010

Find What You Love and MOVE

Someone commented on my last post that they admired gardens, but didn't like gardening, although they appreciated the calorie burn.

You shouldn't do something just to burn calories (although taking the stairs, etc. is always a good). You should do it because you love it, and the calorie burn is just a good side benefit.

The point is that if you find something that you love to do that involves movement, then you'll do it. Exercising just to burn calories is a recipe for long-term failure because you won't stick with what you don't love.

So, instead of obsessing over what will burn calories faster, just think of how you can find new ways to get off the sofa, chair, etc and just MOVE.

If putting on music and dancing around the house makes you happy, then put on music and dance around the house.

If taking a stroll with your dog twice a day is what you love, then do that.

If taking a hike with a friend thrills you, then take a hike.

If watching TV is your thing, put a treadmill in front of the TV and take a walk as you watch.

If twisting yourself into new positions is what challenges you, become a yogi.

Just get up, start moving and stop eating unhealthy foods.

And the weight will come off and stay off.

It All Began in a Garden

It was a beautiful long weekend. I say "long weekend" because since the kids had Good Friday off from school, I had Good Friday off. I took them on hike on Friday, and did the requisite Easter stuff (dyeing eggs, hiding eggs, finding eggs).

But, I also had my first weekend of doing some substantial work in the yard. The weather was beautiful--warm without being hot and humid with a lot of sun.

I have been "gardening" in a sense for a few weeks now. I had started some seeds a few weeks back for parsley, cilantro, swiss chard and kale. They're about ready to set out in the garden. I've also done some Spring clean-up, and I've of course ventured out to pick some of the earlier daffodils to liven up the house.

This weekend, however, I was outdoors in earnest. While the kids ran around the yard and played on the playground on Friday, I swept through the yard picking up stray twigs and branches that fell onto the lawn. I then spread some fertilizer.

And, my gardening activities had some caloric payback. According to the calorie chart I consulted, spreading fertilizer burns approximately 170 calories an hour. I spent a little more than an hour on this chore (and a lot of it was spent pushing the spreader up and down the hills that make up my year.) Picking up the twigs and branches (which also involved pushing a wheelbarrow) also burned approximately another 200 calories. So, I burned about 370 calories (on top of what I burned hiking), just by spending some time outdoors.

On Saturday, I had an absolutely wonderful power walk then headed off to Tai Chi. After that I spent two hours pruning my rose bushes. I have rather extensive perennial beds, some inherited from the previous owner, and the rest added to and/or extended by me. I absolutely love roses, and although I avoid the fussiest varieties (i.e., Hybrid Teas), I have quite a few Floribundas, grandifloras, climbing, David Austin, Heritage, and modern hybrids. All need to be pruned every year when the forsythia bloom. So this was the weekend to do it.

I have one rather spectacular white flowered climbing rose whose name has been lost. It's a rather aggressive grower, having its own rosy notion of Manifest Destiny in the garden. It takes more time to prune this one bush, then all the others combined. But year after year, my efforts are rewarded with spectacular season-long blooms.

Besides, pruning burns approximately 70 calories every fifteen minutes, so in the hour I spent pruning this climber, I burned 280 calories.

I did a lot of other work this weekend, including hauling compost, spreading compost and weeding, and there's still so much more to do. But it's all worth it. Gardening is probably my favorite calorie burning activity, because of the visual rewards. I love looking out my windows to what my efforts have wrought.

And, my waistline looks so much better for the effort as well.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Let's Get NEAT

http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20100402/hl_hsn/turningyourworkdayintoweightloss

As I've said before, its the little movements that add up to more weight loss than big gym work-outs (although those are important too).

Eating Pasture Raised Meat Can Help you Lose Weight.

Pasture raised meat and dairy has fewer calories and fat. It's also nutritionally superior: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/the-nutritional-superiori_b_517707.html

Even if you eat a typical amount of beef (66.5 pounds a year), switching to lean grass-fed beef will save you 17,733 calories a year. That means that even if everything else in your diet remains constant, you'll lose about six pounds a year.

I would, of course, recommend also reducing the amount of beef you consume, and adding more fresh fruits and vegetables.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

The Principal Lost 20 Pounds

I know I seem to be obsessing about Jamie Oliver the last few days, but he is all over the news, and what little I've seen this week about food and health related issues all seems to point back to him. But what intrigued me to post the link to this article: http://www.dailymail.com/foodandliving/201003300192, isn't so much the discussion about Jamie's program, but the part about how the principal of the West Virginia school lost 20 pounds by eating healthy and dining with the kids.

Get that? This principal lost 20 pounds eating Olivers' school lunches. What does that tell you? Eating healthy and eating less processed foods is a path to weight loss. There are no miracles to weight loss, no magic bullets, no secret combinations of food. Just eat less stuff made by corporate America and more made by mother nature.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Gee, I never Would Have Guessed

That kids might not like healthy food.


Marion Nestle posted this: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/03/spoil-alert-jamie-oliver-evaluated/ . It's a study showing that 77% of the kids at the school Oliver is working out "hate" the lunches, participation rates have gone down 9% and milk consumption down 25%.

Gee, kids would prefer eating sugar laden junk food to healthy, nutritious food. What a surprise (rolling eyes). Of course kids would prefer to eat junk. Junk is fun to eat, and "tastes better."

The question should not be what kids prefer to eat, but what they should be eating. Kids should not have the option of drinking HFCS laden milk at school, home, or anywhere else. They also should be presented with the same kind of food Jamie serves at school at home, and told 'EAT OR STARVE."

Believe me, no kid will choose starve. It's time we stop catering to kids and feeding them what they want and giving them what they should be eating at both school and at home.

I am so sick of people saying "but Johnny won't eat that." Johnny won't eat that because he knows damn well that if he doesn't eat the grilled chicken now, he'll get a processed chicken nugget later. If Johnny knew that there was no processed chicken nugget in his future, you can bet for damn sure that grilled chicken would be devoured.

What really gets me is the drop in participation rates from the lunch program at the school Oliver was at. That essentially means the parents are complicit in their kids' bad eating habits. These parents should be telling their children "you have to eat what served," not "what dear, you don't like the food, don't worry, I'll pack you a Pop Tart."

Like losing weight, getting kids to eat right is not easy. There is no magic formula that will get them to choose to eat steamed corn over Doritos. It is hard difficult work, and you, as a parent, have to make a lot of hard choices. Kids saying that they think food is "yucky" is no excuse to not serving that food to them and making them realize that they have no other choices if they don't eat that food.

The "Nanny" state?




As I wrote yesterday, I really appreciate what Jamie Oliver is trying to do on his new show. But of course, there are critics. I really do not understand what so-called "conservatives" and libertarians find so repulsive about trying to get people to eat healthy. Just a few months ago, I blogged about Glenn Beck getting worked up just because a Maryland school district decided to have meatless Mondays, and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity sneer at any meal that doesn't include a copious amount of beef (I wonder what kind of payments these guys get from the beef board?)

So, it goes without saying that the Conservative voices that be are outraged by Food Revolution. One piece I found intriguing is from Reason the mouthpiece of the "libertarian" movement. You can read it here: http://reason.com/archives/2010/03/25/jamie-olivers-ministry-of-food/singlepage


OK, here's what I don't get. School lunches are already heavily regulated. They're probably the most heavily regulated food service industry in the country. So why pull a conniption fit just because people want to change those regulations to make the food healthier? Second, these are kids, and adults should be in charge of what they eat, so if adults are making decisions to change what is being done, how does that make us a "Nanny" state? Do these people really believe that reworking school lunches so that they include more fresh fruits and vegetables and fewer processed foods will really put us on the path of being some kind of a totalitarian state?

Even more telling is that the tone of the article seems to suggest that Reason is actually afraid of Oliver because of his popularity. This isn't just some crazy, tree hugging hippy that people will ignore. Horrors, people may actually LISTEN and do what Oliver says.

Now I did find some of the discussion as to how Oliver has tripped up in his mission (the suggested school lunches with excess calories and fat was particularly intriguing). Hey, if the guy is advocating something just as bad he should be made aware of it. But, curiously, the article seems to be more annoyed that Oliver is even suggesting that we all eat better. That somehow or another, it's an affront to freedom to try to get people to seriously think about what they are eating.

I find this argument curious coming from a Libertarian mouthpiece since Libertarians are supposed to be so concerned about taxes, etc. In fact, in the video above, the main objection the Reason people seem to have to improving school lunches is that they don't want to spend the money on it (Does that woman really believe that a Healthy Choice microwave meal is really healthy?)

If they're so concerned about money then why don't they realize that in the end we all pay for each others bad eating habits. One study projects that obesity related diseases cost Americans upwards of $150 billion a year. That's BILLION with a "B." That translates to higher health insurance premiums, and higher taxes to cover Medicare and Medicaid.

Since the author of this Reason article claimed that most healthy adults couldn't identify a beet, cauliflower or an eggplant, I have to chalk up a lot the hullabaloo to just plain ignorance. Being ignorant has somehow gotten to be a badge of honor in this country. It's amazing that a country founded by some of the greatest thinkers of all time, who were willing to open themselves up to being educated and thinking of things so differently, is now so willing wrap itself up and its ignorance and curse at anyone trying to educate.


Tuesday, March 30, 2010

You're More Likely to get Killed by Your Food than Homicide




A truly inspiring and educational speech by Jamie Oliver as he accepts a TED prize.

Junk Food is Like Cocaine

Another, more detailed, story on that study showing how eating highly processed food is addicting: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/index.html



I found the comparison to cocaine fascinating. Coca leaves have been around for centuries, but it was only once they were purified into cocaine, that it became addictive. In the same way, purifying corn into substances like high fructose corn syrup makes food addictive.

I think the lesson here is that we have to view our own junk food urges in the same way we've treated addictions like nicotine in the past. It's an addiction, and addictions are not easy to get over. It takes more than just willpower, and once the addiction is finely kicked, we can never go back.

More importantly, we have to think apply this research to our children's diets. We may all be addicted to processed foods, but there's still hope for our children.

Monday, March 29, 2010

Losing Weight is a Bitch

Because, junk food is addictive: http://www.losethattyre.co.uk/is-fast-food-really-as-addictive-as-heroin-and-cocaine/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+co%2FPDCB+%28Lose+That+Tyre%29

Making the change from eating highly processed food to healthier, real food is not easy. I'll be the first to admit that. As the article above discussed, junk food is addictive. Our brains are wired so that we crave it. What's more, our brains don't get the same "high" from eating a salad as it does a Whopper.

But, like a drug addict or an alcoholic, we have to break our addiction to junk foods. Just as drugs and excessive alcohol is bad for our health, and bad for society, so is excessive consumption of unhealthy foods.

We have to learn to replace that processed bag of cookies we snack on with healthier alternatives like a handful of nuts or raisins, and learn to make ourselves a salad for lunch instead of running to McDonald's for a burger and fries.

We need to do it for ourselves, and we need to do it for our families.

And, because fast food is addictive, we have to just say "no" to our children when they ask for it. We can not perpetuate the addiction. We have to take charge of our children's health and their diets so that they grow up knowing how to eat to remain a healthy weight.

Now this Is Really Sad




I DVRed Jamie Oliver's new show on ABC Food Revolution and watched it this weekend. This part of the show really struck me. These children couldn't identify any vegetables. I'm not talking about anything exotic like arugula. The children in this classroom didn't know what a real tomato or potato looked like.

You have to ask what the parents of these children are not only cooking for their kids (if they cook), but what they eat themselves. My daughter won't touch a tomato, but she sure as hell knows what one is. She's even helped me to pick them in the garden.

It's no wonder that half the adults in this town are obese. If their children can't identify basic fruits and vegetables, it shows an appalling lack of these foods in their own homes.

By not eating these fruits and vegetables themselves, and not exposing their children to them, the parents in this community are not only damaging their own health, but the health of their children.

Getting healthy and slim means taking ownership of your food. Taking ownership means preparing your own food, from scratch, with real ingredients. It can be done, and takes no more time then running out to a fast food joint to pick it up.

Friday, March 26, 2010

OK, It's Now a Fact

High Fructose Corn Syrup makes you fat. According to a Princeton study, rats fed HFCS gained significantly more weight and became fatter than rats fed regular old sugar. Both sets of rats were fed the EXACT SAME NUMBER OF CALORIES.

You can read about it here: http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/91/22K07/ . It's a fascinating study, and I highly recommend reading the press release.

Additionally, the rats fed HFCS had abnormal increases of body fat, and long term consumption of HFCS led to the rats becoming obese.

So the bottom line is, if it contains HFCS, just step away. You don't want to eat or drink it. Of course, anything containing HFCS is highly processed, and that alone should be enough for you to avoid consuming it.

Improving School Lunch

There's a bill in the Senate that would require the Agriculture Department to improve the standards of school lunches. You can read about it here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/26/senate-advances-school-lu_n_514660.html

If passed, the food they feed our children in school will be healthier, and, hopefully, lead to better eating habits so they don't have to deal with the weight problems their parents do. It won't be a massive turn-around--they'll be no seaweed, crusted tofu rolls-- but kids might see their pizza made with whole-wheat crust and low fat mozzarella.

I'm all for improvement. I'm sure critics will say the proposed legislation does not go far enough, but I say any step in the right direction is a step in the right direction.

On the same note, Jamie Oliver's show "Food Revolution" premiers tonight on ABC. I plan on setting my DVR. On the show, he tries to improve school lunches in one town.

Just Dance



Now that its Spring, I've been gradually working on getting my diet in order again. It's seems to have become a cycle of sorts these last few years. In the late Autumn and Winter I crave cooked foods, so the proportion of raw fruits and vegetables I eat goes down, and I gain some weight (and let's not forget the holidays).

Then Spring comes and I start eating less cooked food and more raw food and do a few gentle cleanses, and the weight comes back off again. In the last few weeks I've moved from mostly having oatmeal or eggs in the morning back to fruit and fresh squeezed grapefruit juice. My lunch time salads have more vegetables, and dinner is becoming more centered around raw ingredients again.

But just as importantly, I'm moving around more again. With the sunshine beckoning, I head outside and putter around in the yard for an hour or two. Instead of a one hour work-out on the treadmill, I'll take a two or three hour hike with a girlfriend. Instead of huddling inside with a cup of tea, I'll venture outside in the yard just to see what blooms are popping up in the garden.

I think we tend to focus too much on "work-out" when we're trying to lose weight, and forget that just moving around in general is probably even important then scheduling time at the gym. Getting into the habit of taking a short stroll to the sandwich shop to get your lunch instead of driving there, or walking out to your mailbox to get the mail instead of waiting until you drive by your mailbox will probably do more to jump start your weight loss/maintenance then any high octane gym work-out you won't stick with. If you make a concerted effort to just move more you could easily burn an additional 200 calories a day which can add up to close to an additional 1 to 1 1/2 pounds lost monthly.

Even just dancing can help. If you go to that wedding or Bar Mitzvah, get out on the dance floor and just dance. Or put on some music you like and just dance around the house. Dancing can burn 300 to 500 calories an hour depending on how vigorously you do it.

Just dance, and don't think about how uncoordinated you look to the rest of the world, but think about how much trimmer you'll be for getting out on the dance floor.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Another Reason to Get Out in the Garden More

http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100324/sc_livescience/whyoverweightwomenstruggletoslimdown

Rev Up the Treadmill Ladies

Because you need to do at least an hour of exercise a day to fend off flab: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100323/ap_on_he_me/us_med_middle_aged_spread

An hour a day of exercise does sound daunting, which is why you have to work it in whenever you can. That's why I LOVE my treadmill. I parked it in front of a flat-screen TV, and that's where I now do most of my TV watching. If I can watch TV I can exercise. With on-demand programing and DVR, whenever I can find the time I jump on and catch up on Mad Men, True Blood, movies and whatever else I want to watch. So much better than sitting on a sofa with a bag of chips.

Cooking from the Garden


Unbelievably, despite the cold winter and past few weeks of torrential rains, the daffodils have started blooming in my garden. Yesterday I strolled down to the herb garden to see how things are faring and found both chives and scallions ready to pick.
I wanted to incorporate these harbingers of Spring into dinner last night so I whipped up a batch of Creamy Avocado Dressing With Herbs. This is a great dressing that satisfies that urge for a creamy salad dressing without having to resort to sour cream or mayonnaise. In fact, the only fat in the dressing is the avocado itself (butter milk is fat free). I don't even use any other oil. The buttermilk also adds a bit of "tang" to the dressing which I love. The squeeze of lemon juice helps to retain the color, so if you don't use it right away it can keep for a few days in the fridge (and never seems to last longer than that). I sat down one day to figure out the calories in the dressing (based on the ingredients) and figured out that 1/4 of a cup (which is a big helping) has about 70 calories in it, which is great when you compare it to other creamy dressings' calorie counts.
Best of all. the Avocado and fresh herbs in the dressing help to up my raw percentage for the week. It's not a completely raw dressing, but it's more than half raw.
I also love this dressing because it makes a great "sauce" to use on poached fish or grilled meats. Last night I made a simple dinner of poached salmon and a salad of romaine leaves and grape tomatoes (you know my motto, "have a little raw with every meal"). I then used my Creamy Avocado Dressing with Herbs over both the fish and the salad. I also love to use this dressing on grilled chicken breasts. If you serve the meat cold, it's a great summer meal.
Creamy AvocadoDressing with Herbs
1 ripe avocado, peeled and pitted
2 scallions, both green and white parts, coarsely chopped
1/4 cup fresh chives
1/2 cup fresh parsley
3 tablespoons white wine, champagne or White balsamic vinegar
juice from 1/2 lemon
1 cup buttermilk
salt and pepper
Put everything in a blender and puree until smooth.
Note: if you reduce the buttermilk to 1/2 cup, this also makes a great vegetable dip for crudities.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Shout-Out to a Great New Blog

Whenever I find a great new blog I just love to give it a shout out. As any regular reader knows, I'm obsessed with how our kids eat, and how school lunch plays into that role.

Well, a self-proclaimed "next generation" lunch lady is on a mission to change school lunch and is blogging about it here: http://bravenewlunch.blogspot.com/

I've added her to my following list and am anticipating future blogs.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Calorie Labeling will Go National

Thanks to the new Health Care Reform legislation, national chains will be required to list calories on the food they serve. Marion Nestle writes about it on her blog which you can read here: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/03/calorie-labeling-to-go-national/

You can also read about it here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100323/ap_on_re_us/us_calories_on_menus

Because of my actual work, I've been following the HCR legislation pretty closely, and mostly liked what I saw. Several years ago, I found out my family couldn't get an individual health insurance policy at any price because of pre-existing conditions within our family (my son has autism, my husband has been on anti-depressants and I've had skin cancer).

In other words, prior to this legislation, my husband had to have a job with benefits. He could not be self employed (like myself), and if he was to lose his job and COBRA benefits ran out, then we would be left without insurance.

So needless to say, when I found out that they wanted to tax things like self-tanning salons and soda to pay for universal health insurance, I was all for it. I'm more then willing to pay a little extra for a soda or to lie on a tanning bed so that I know my family can always get health insurance.

What has amazed me is the flurry of mis-information that has surrounded this bill. It's indeed shameful the state to which our political system has devolved. We will essentially have EXACTLY the same system of health insurance we had before. Employers will be the primary system for delivering insurance to the employed, Medicare will still provide for the elderly and Medicaid for the poor and disabled.

What will change is that their will be a system of "exchanges" set up in states to provide for people who can't get insurance through their employers, and employers with more than 50 employees will pay a fine if they don't provide basic health insurance to employees. Insurance companies will be more closely regulated so they can't deny you insurance for pre-existing conditions nor drop you once you become sick.

It is not a socialized system of medicine (which BTW we already have since Medicare and Medicaid are actually the two biggest providers of HC benefits in the country). And, the legislation is currently scored to actually reduce the deficit, not increase it.

Throw in the national calorie counts, and I'm feeling pretty good about all this.

Monday, March 22, 2010

How to Lose Weight Using Raw Foods

Good article: http://www.johnisfit.com/2010/03/22/how-to-lose-weight-with-raw-foods/

I think the advise to start slowly is sane. It's always better to take the tortoise, rather than the hare, approach to weight loss. Take small steps that you'll stick with for the rest of your life and then over time ramp them up.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Accepting Reality

On Tuesday I went to look at a school for my 15 year old autistic son. My son is one of the loves of my life. I adore him, and can't stand to be parted from him.

But the school I looked at on Tuesday was a residential program. If he goes there, he'll be living there most of the time.

This has been a new journey for me. After 12 years in the public school system here in town (he started when he was three), I have come to the realization that the local school system can no longer meet his needs. He still can't dress himself independently or tie a shoe-lace. I have to shower him, and he has no social life. He goes to school and then comes home and is entertained whenever my husband or I have the time. He spends his down time mostly engaging in autistic behaviors, or, doing that thing that teen-age boys are apt to do.

Last summer my son went to a sleep away camp for special needs kids, and he loved it. He had friends, and the staff kept him engaged 24/7. Whenever we spoke with him on the phone, you couldn't help but notice how happy he was. For once he was just one of the crowd, not the "weird" kid.

So here I was on Tuesday looking at a school that would send my baby away. It's a hard realization, and a far cry from were I was 12 years ago when I originally got his diagnosis.

Back then, I thought I'd eventually find some "cure" and that in the end, everything would be all right. He'd go to college, get married, have kids yada, yada, yada. But after years of chasing various miracle diets, therapies and spending tons of money, he was were we started: an adorable loving boy, with an IQ below 80 and severe communications delays.

So now I have to face reality. My son will need life-long care, and although I want to now keep him with me, I can't. I'd be placing my own needs before his own. He needs to be somewhere they can really teach daily living skills and a vocation and provide him with a social life on his level.

Losing weight and maintaining it is a lot like that as well. We've all tried the fad diets, the miracle therapies that were supposed to shed pounds, but in the long run nothing works. The only thing that does work is hard work. You have to eat less and exercise more.

Facing reality is hard, but in the end, we all have to face it.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Do Antibiotics Make Us Fat?

A compelling post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/do-antibiotics-make-peopl_b_491808.html

I had no idea that ranchers gave antibiotics to cattle to make them gain weight quicker.

However, while the author of this piece focused on medical antibiotics, if excess antibiotics are a reason for excessive weight gain in humans, I'd focus more on the antibiotics given to animals as a cause for the problem.

It's probably true that antibiotics are somewhat over-prescribed. When I was a teenager, a dermatologist put me on antibiotics for two years to clear up acne. It did clear up my skin, but it has caused a host of other health issues. I'm now resistant to antibiotics so when I do get sick and need antibiotics now I need extraordinary doses. I've had pneumonia twice and being resistant to antibiotics was a major stumbling block in both recoveries.

My teen-age antibiotic use also led to years of constant yeast infections, including two bouts with systemic yeast infections. I did manage to clear up that problem once I started my cleansing regimes. Yeast infections no longer plague me like they once did, but they were pretty constant for over thirty years.

I also have abnormally yellow teeth which my dentist told me is from my previous anti-biotic use.

So, needless to say, I'm always looking for meat which is raised without antibiotics. Given my previous history, I think avoiding it now is imperative. If it could lead to excessive weight gain later on, avoiding it for my children's sake is even more of a reason to avoid it.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

You're Fat because

I found this picture on another blog. You can find it here: http://shapelyweightfrom1958.blogspot.com/

I love it because it speaks the truth. There actually is no other reason for being overweight other than you eat to much.

Now, I understand that people have different metabolisms, and that for some it is a real struggle to lose weight. But the reality is that while you may have been cursed with the metabolism of a slug, the only reason why you may not be as thin as you'd like to be is that for your metabolism, you simply EAT TOO MUCH. If you want to lose weight then the one and only way to do it is to eat less and exercise more.

So, in your weight loss journey you have to accept the fact that you, yourself, are the only determinant of what your ultimate weight will be. Don't blame anyone or anything else.

If giving up chocolate are ice cream to have a 28 inch waist is more than you can stand, then just accept the fact that you'll have a 32 inch waist, and that no magic pill or combination of foods will slim you down further.

The Best Way to Cook your Veggies?

An interesting post by Marion Nestle: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2010/03/the-fate-of-vitamins-in-vegetables-stored-and-cooked/

While eating veggies raw is definitely best, that can get boring. What I found interesting, however, is that the microwave is one of the best ways to cook vegetables if you are going to cook them. I always thought otherwise, although I still did it because of time constraints. I guess I don't have to feel as guilty about it as I have been.

However, I would still recommend microwaving in glass and not plastic.

Is the Universe Conspiring Against Me?

I'm still working on losing my Winter/Holiday weight gain, or at least not gain any more weight. The one area were I have always excelled is exercise. I actually love to be physically active, so exercising for a couple of hours a day or more is not a chore.

This week, however, everything in the universe seems to be conspiring against me. First of all this weekend, we had torrential rainfall, winds and flooding here in New England meaning that doing anything outside had to be scratched. I also couldn't go to yoga. The News Reports advised people to stay home because power lines were down and trees were blocking many roads.

"No problem" I said to myself, "that's why I have the treadmill." But when I hopped on my treadmill on Saturday afternoon and tried to get a work-out in while watching an episode from the first season of Mad Men I got an "error" message on the screen. My treadmill would not work.

Making matters worse, the storm knocked out power and telephone lines across the whole New York and New England region. I have yet to be able to make an appointment to get my treadmill serviced because power and phone lines are still out at the company I bought it from.

Thank God the weather finally improved and I started walking out-doors, going to yoga etc. But now I've been hit with a monster cold. It is virtually impossible for me to breathe through my nose and despite taking anti-histamines, using my neti pot, rubbing my chest with vapor rub etc., I barely slept last night because of the congestion. Normally I go to yoga on Wednesday but I feel so miserable I think I have to just stay home and rest.

I don't know what I did to anger the exercise gods, but I do hope they get over it.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

What's Your BMI???

This site tells you how to calculate it: http://weightloss.suite101.com/article.cfm/how-to-calculate-body-mass-index

Essentially, you divide your weight by your height squared then multiply that by 703.

For me it's 131 divided by 62 inches squared or 131 divided by 3844 multiplied by 703 which gets me to a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 23.9. That puts me in the "normal" range neither underweight or overweight.

I'm still a bit heavier then I like to be (extra holiday weight that's still refusing to come off). If I can get back down to my new "normal" weight of 128 my BMI drops to 23.4 and if I can get back down to 124 pounds (where I flirted briefly last summer) my BMI drops to 22.6 pounds.

Another Reason to Avoid Processed Foods

It can kill you: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mercola/msg-is-this-silent-killer_b_491502.html

As Michael Pollan says, if you can't pronounce it, don't eat it.

I Hate Daylight Savings Time

I absolutely loathe Daylight Savings Time. Since I have to get out of bed between 5:15 and 6 to get the kids ready for school, exercise etc. it means I have to wake up for a big chunk of the year in the dark, which is miserable. It was finally getting to the point when there was some light in the morning when BANG, DST starts and its pitch black again.

My poor kids don't want to get out of bed either. "Mommy it's still dark outside!!" My daughter argues. "Yes, I know sweetheart," I tell her, "but the government thinks that somehow this saves energy."

When my son's bus comes at 6:50 it's still dark.

I've been in a fog for the last two days because I'm losing sleep in the morning, and my work-outs have not been as vigorous because I want a nap.

I hate Daylight Savings Time. Could we at least go back to the old schedule where it didn't start until May?

Monday, March 15, 2010

The Raw Food Diet and Detox

I found this article about Steve Pavlina very interesting: http://diet-trends.suite101.com/article.cfm/the-raw-food-diet-and-weight-loss.

I actually followed Steve's blog back in 2008 when he went completely raw and it was one of the reasons why I moved towards raw foodism as well. I'm not completely raw, although I have gone through 1 to 4 week periods of doing so to detox. I generally stick to a 50% rule--more than 50% of my weekly diet has to be raw, vegan foods, and I usually aim to have at least 66% of my diet raw/vegan.

Pavlina, however, has gone another route, and is a full-time raw vegan. That's just a bit too intense for me. I do admit, however, that I always feel great when I go completely raw, even if just for a few days, but I can't imagine living that way for the rest of my life. It's just too extreme for me, and I just enjoy food too much. I also don't relish the thought of being the biggest food pain in the ass whenever I go out.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Want to Avoid Gaining 10 or 20 pounds???





You are what you drink.

Did you realize that drinking one bottle of Snapple's Agave Melon Antioxidant water is the equivalent of eating three bowls of Honeycomb, and that to work off the calories you'll have to shovel snow for 20 minutes?

Drinking a bottle of Snapple's Lemon Iced tea is the equivalent of eating six Fudgsicle bars, and drinking a 16 oz bottle of SunnyD is the equivalent of eating 8 Eggo Choco-nilla waffles.

And a drinking a bottle of Minute Maid lemonade is the equivalent of eating six Good Humor Ice Cream sandwiches. 0

And, if you think you're being healthy by drinking a Naked Protein Zone Banana, well you might as well have eaten five Breyer's Oreo Ice Cream sandwiches.

What you drink influences what you weight more than what you eat does. If your drinking habits regularly include any of these drinks, you may want to rethink the habit.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Beware of Big Corporations Bearing Gifts

Because it is in their economic interests to keep us fat and watching TV. Marion Nestle reports on a disturbing new trend, big corporations essentially silencing their critics with money. Read about it here: http://www.foodpolitics.com/

It's doesn't take a dummy to figure out that if Weight Watchers is getting compensated by McDonalds to have Weight Watchers' "approved" meals on their menus, Weight Watchers is unlikely to recommend to its dieters to stop eating fast food (which they should).

Additionally, if Pepsi is funding a fellowship at Yale for doctoral work in nutrition science, you can bet dollars to doorknobs that new "science" isn't going to be critical of sugary soft drinks.

And, it is indeed disturbing that a big corporation like Disney can arm twist Harvard into evicting an organization that proved that its advertising was false.

People, while going to the polls is extremely important (and you should vote every chance you get), its more important to consider how and were you spend your money. You vote with your money, and if big corporations don't get yours, they can't use it to undermine your efforts to keep yourself and your family at healthy weight.

Book Review


A friend recently lent me Superfoods by David Wolfe. The premise of the book is that certain foods are nutritionally rich and by consuming them you'll get a dietary and healing leg up.

The book was interesting, but I was less then impressed by the "science" backing up the claims of the author. And, while some of the foods listed are probably readily available at a local health food store, others seemed to be harder to seek out.

The "Superfoods" Wolfe promotes are: goji berries, cacao, maca, bee products including honey, bee pollen, royal jelly and propolis, spirulina, AFA Blue-green algae, marine phytoplankton, aloe vera, hempseed, and coconuts.

There are also seven "honorable mentions" which are: Acai; camu camu berry, chlorella, Incan berries, kelp, noni and yacon.

Oh, and by the way, Wolfe says that to get the benefits of these foods you have to eat them raw.

Overall, Wolfe's book is an interesting quick read, but I'm glad I borrowed it and didn't have to buy it myself.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Chart of the Day


Read about it here: http://www.pcrm.org/magazine/gm07autumn/health_pork.html. The politics behind the policy is fascinating.
Even if you are against taxing unhealthy food, why does so much of the taxes we already pay go to subsidizing food that is unhealthy?

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Want to Lose 5 Pounds a Year?

Push for an 18% tax on soda and pizza: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100308/hl_nm/us_food_tax

According to research an 18% tax on soda and pizza can lower adults' intake enough to lower their weight by an average of 5 pounds a year.

Makes sense to me.

I Need a Nap

I don't know why but I have really been dragging for the last few days. I don't know why, I slept in both Saturday and Sunday, and overall it was a pretty relaxing weekend. Yesterday I was so tired in the afternoon, I actually took a nap and then conked out around 9 pm last night.

But here it is at 8 am in the morning, and I'm ready for another nap. Maybe I'm fighting off something? I don't know, but I've got some work to do so I'm going to make myself a cup of tea and get that done.

Then I might head back upstairs for a while and get some more sleep.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Fresh is Best, but . . . .

The rhyming continues!! As all of you know I am a huge advocate of eating fresh fruits and vegetables. But, we all know that sometimes fresh fruits and vegetables are just not easily available.

The good news is that frozen vegetables are a good substitute: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2010/03/08/frozen_veggies_retain_more_nutrients.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+diet-blog+%28Diet+Blog%29

This time of year I always keep my freezer stocked with frozen, organic vegetables so that I can whip up a meal in a pinch. In Summer and Fall there's so much good local produce around that I don't have to eat frozen vegetables, but this time of year I find that a bag of frozen, organic peas is better than no veggies at all.

A Bowl of Oatmeal a Day Sheds the Pounds Away

Sorry for the rhyming, but I can't help myself. One of my favorite breakfasts gets the thumbs up: http://weight-loss-methods.suite101.com/article.cfm/oatmeal-for-breakfast-promotes-weight-loss

Note what it says further down in the article. To get the benefits of oatmeal, you have to eat the real thing. You're not doing yourself any favors by eating that flavored stuff in the packets. Besides, with a microwave, whipping up some real old-fashioned, rolled oats only takes a couple of minutes.

A Tipple A Day Keeps the Pounds at Bay

As if I needed an excuse to have a glass of wine? http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100308/hl_afp/healthwomenobesityalcohol

Friday, March 5, 2010

You Might Want to Skip the Salad

The Cheesecake Factory's Caesar salad has 1,513 calories. California Pizza Kitchen's Waldorf Chicken salad has a whopping 1,570 calories.

Those are just two of the unhealthiest salads you can get. Find out about the others here: http://health.yahoo.com/experts/eatthis/47832/the-unhealthiest-salads-in-america/

I can't tell you how many times I've been to restaurants, ordered a "salad" to start only to be served some caloric disaster containing copious amounts of cheese, croutons etc and very little actual vegetables (I always get the dressing on the side). Lately I just send it back, asking that the offending ingredients be removed.

Why are America's restaurants working so hard to make us fat? If someone orders a "salad" they are no doubt trying to watch their weight. So why make it harder for us?

These calorie bomb salads are just proof that we need legislation requiring calorie counts on menus. Something tells me that once people see that the "salad" they were thinking of ordering contains close to their entire calorie allotment for the day, I'm sure they wouldn't order it.

Now this is just plain lazy

I'm speechless: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2010/03/04/not_so_fine_day_for_a_walk.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+diet-blog+%28Diet+Blog%29

Big Weight Loss Requires Big Changes

But sometimes to get to big changes, you may need to start out one small step at a time: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2010/03/05/big_weight_loss_requires_big_changes.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+diet-blog+%28Diet+Blog%29

Better a series of small steps that you stick with, then one big one that you can't.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Monty Python--Back in the Day



Yesterday, I caught an old episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus on IFC. The episode opened up with the camera focusing in on a number of women in bikinis before panning over to John Cleese sprawled out on a desk also wearing a bikini.

Now, I had seen this episode before a number of times, but this time I was struck by the women. Although taped as being the ultimate in desirable women, I don't think a single one of them would make it on camera today. These women all had hips and thighs, and some even had rolls on their tummies. What's more, they didn't have gargantuan breasts. In fact, in relation to the size of their hips and thighs, their breasts were rather small.

I tried to find the clip on Youtube, but all I could find was a similar scene from the movie And Now for Something Completely Different. Apparently in the time period between the filming of the original show and the movie standards had already begun to change. The women in the movie scene were all much thinner than the ones in the old TV show (although none of them had the huge breasts you see today).

Even though they were heavy by today's standards, the girls in the original TV cliplooked real. And, although thinner the girls in the movie still looked real. They didn't look like the distorted women we see today who've been liposuctioned and augmented to the point that they look like cartoons and not real women.

It Happens Every Noon




This is a truly fascinating piece to watch. It's a government film from 1966 promoting the school lunch program.

If the embedded player isn't working, you can also view the film here: http://www.archive.org/details/it_happens_every_noon

It's fascinating for a number of reasons. The cultural attitudes forty years ago, particularly towards girls and women, is interesting, and the conditions of some of the rural schools back then was appalling.

But, what I found most interesting, is that not a single one of the kids in this film is overweight or obese. Even the one described towards the end of the film as possibly needing to skip a meal or two is not all that heavy by today's standards.

While the food in this government film needs some improvement, e.g., fresh vegetables for canned, it still looks vastly superior to what's on the plate today as detailed by Mrs. Q in the School Lunch Project. Check out her blog here: http://fedupwithschoollunch.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

We Don't Have the Science, But We're Going to Make the Claim Anyway


Kellogg is petitioning the European Union to allow it to claim that its cereals help with weight loss. Read about it here: http://www.foodpolitics.com/

Apparently, Kellogg's doesn't have to prove scientifically that their cereals promote weight loss, but it's interesting that they can't just throw the claim on the box as they do here. It doesn't sound like a perfect process, but at least it is a process.

As to the claims, they're dubious at best, as you can read here: http://www.diet-blog.com/archives/2006/03/09/special_k_diet_cereal_for_weight_loss.php

That doesn't stop Kellogg's, of course, they enthusiastically promote their diet and even have an entire website devoted to it. See it here: http://www.specialk.com/challenge

Of course you'll lose weight if you eat fewer calories, so if you substitute a bowl of Special K, for a Cheeseburger and fries, you will lose weight in the short term.

The problem is, of course, that you won't keep that weight off. As soon as you return to eating the cheeseburger and fries instead of the cereal, you will regain the weight.

Real long-term weight loss comes from making real changes to your diet that you'll stick with for the rest of your life, not replacing meals with a bowl of cereal for a few weeks.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Constant Eating

The "snack culture" has led to childhood obesity rates increasing by 16%: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100302/hl_nm/us_obesity_children_usa

We're making our kids sick by feeding them a consistent diet of junk. They get heart disease at younger ages (http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20100302/hl_hsn/futureheartdiseasemaybeinstoreforobesekids) and they're more prone to broken bones (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100301/hl_nm/us_obese_injure)

What is it going to take for our culture to stop damaging our children with food? Kids do not need to eat constantly, they need more exercise, and the only result of not eating a healthy nutritious dinner should be that they have to wait until the next healthy, nutritious meal is put in front of them.

Our children are our responsibility. No body else is putting junk food in their mouths.

Monday, March 1, 2010

The Smaller You are the Harder it Is

As you may already know if you want to lose weight you have to burn off 3500 calories above and beyond what your caloric need. How many calories you need to maintain your current weight and how many calories you burn in any given exercise depends on your current weight. But, whether you weigh 140 pounds or 250 pounds you still have to burn off those extra 3500 calories to lose a pound.

I was reminded how much easier it is to lose weight when you're heavier this evening when I jumped on the treadmill for a quick work-out. My husband had used the treadmill this weekend and entered his weight into the calorie meter.

I forgot to reset it and was initially shocked to see how fast I seemed to be burning calories compared to normal. Then I remembered that I forgot to set the calorie meter.

I decided to continue my work-out just to see the difference. In the time it took me to burn 250 calories, according to the calorie meter, my husband would have burned 435 calories.

That's a significant different. If the two of us were to eat exactly how many calories we needed to maintain our current weights and did the exact same work-out on the treadmill it would take him 8 days to burn off a pound, whereas it would take me 14 days.

Unhealthy Kids' Foods

Worth a read: http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/03/01/10-surprisingly-unhealthy-kids-foods-and-their-healthier-alter/